This Valentine’s Day season, I am reminded of Mildred Loving’s and St. Valentine’s acts of justice for the fundamental human right to love who you want. 

Since Trump has taken office, I’m worried about the erosion of LGBTQ+ civil rights. As a matter of fact, I feel like the country is moving into a new Jim Crow era, reestablishing discriminatory laws targeting LGBTQ+ Americans, especially our transgender siblings. 

Related

Donald Trump could go after same-sex marriage rights. We talked to legal experts.
Trump and the GOP been making bold (and possibly) illegal attacks on LGBTQ+ rights. What if marriage is next?

I am, however, immensely thankful I reside in Massachusetts. If Trump tries to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges, the historic U.S. Supreme Court ruling that legalized same-sex marriage in all 50 states, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court legalized same-sex marriage in the 2004 landmark case of Goodridge v. Dept. of Public Health — and its ruling is sticking.

Never Miss a Beat

Subscribe to our newsletter to stay ahead of the latest LGBTQ+ political news and insights.
Subscribe to our Newsletter today

However, that may not be the case for many LGBTQ+ married couples across the country. For example, in a Trumped-up U.S. Supreme Court, there is still talk among Christian evangelicals of walking back Obergefell v. Hodges without disrupting other precedents on marriage, Rebecca Buckwaler-Poza wrote in the article “The End of Gay Rights Under Trump” in the 2017 June issue of Pacific Standard Magazine.

“The Supreme Court can significantly undermine LGBTQ+ rights even without reversing a single case. Right now, the federal prohibition against sex discrimination doesn’t bar discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity; the Equal Protection Clause affords no specific protections for LGBT people, as it does for members of groups defined by race or nationality,” Buckwaler-Poza stated. 

“The Court can strip the rights to intimacy and marriage of their meaning, carving away gradually and masking the magnitude of changes by phrasing them in arcane legal terms,” she added.

However, I am reminded of the tenacity of Mildred Loving, who died in 2008. Mildred Loving, the Black female plaintiff in the landmark 1967 U.S. Supreme Court case of Loving v. Virginia, is often overlooked in the pantheon of African American trailblazers celebrated in February during Black History Month.

She gained notoriety when the court decided in her favor that anti-miscegenation laws are unconstitutional. Her crime was this country’s racial and gender obsession at the time— interracial marriage. Married to a white man, Loving and her husband were indicted by a Virginia grand jury in October 1958 for violating the state’s ‘Racial Integrity Act of 1924.”

Loving understood the interconnection of struggles and supported the same-sex marriage fight. LGBTQ+ couples carry on her tradition in proving the tenacity of love.

On June 12, 2007, Freedom to Marry joined with several of the nation’s leading civil rights organizations to hold a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., to commemorate the 40th anniversary of Loving v. Virginia, a decision for affirming the freedom to marry as a “basic civil right” of every American. 

Lending her support to the commemoration, Mrs. Mildred Loving wrote, “When my late husband, Richard, and I got married in Washington, DC in 1958, it wasn’t to make a political statement or start a fight. We were in love, and we wanted to be married. Not a day goes by that I don’t think of Richard and our love and how much it meant to me to have that freedom to marry the person precious to me, even if others thought he was the ‘wrong kind of person’ for me to marry.” 

Loving continued, “I believe all Americans, no matter their race, no matter their sex, no matter their sexual orientation, should have that same freedom to marry. I am proud that Richard’s and my name are on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, black or white, young or old, gay or straight, seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving and loving are all about.” 

We’re in the season for Trump 2.0, but love is always worth the fight. Since the beheading of St. Valentine in Rome in the year 270 A.D., marriage has been controlled by heads of the church and the state — and not by the hearts of lovers. When Emperor Claudius II issued an edict abolishing marriage because married men hated to leave their families for battle, Valentine, known then as the “friend to lovers,” secretly joined them in holy matrimony. While awaiting his execution, Valentine fell in love with the jailer’s daughter, and in his farewell message to his lover, he wrote, “From your Valentine.”

Happy Valentine’s Day!

Subscribe to the LGBTQ Nation newsletter and be the first to know about the latest headlines shaping LGBTQ+ communities worldwide.