Repeat off

1

Repeat one

all

Repeat all

“Enough to make you weep”: White House shares dystopian January 6th timeline drenched in propaganda
Photo #8357 January 08 2026, 08:15

On the five-year anniversary of the January 6th insurrection, the White House revealed a horrifying microsite filled with lies about what went on that day.

The site includes a timeline that declares as fact that the 2020 election was stolen (almost all the lawsuits filed by the 2020 campaign claiming that an election was stolen in 2020 were dismissed due to a lack of evidence or standing).

Related

Trump says “mean” Dems will impeach him & force “transgender for everyone” if they win midterms

“After law enforcement clears the Capitol, Congress reconvenes late that night and certifies Joe Biden’s electoral votes—votes from battleground states marred by massive mail-in ballot fraud, hidden suitcases of ballots, exploding water pipes, voting machine irregularities, and unprecedented pandemic-era rule changes that bypassed state legislatures,” the site states. “2020 is considered the greatest election theft in U.S. history, with widespread fraud deliberately ignored by courts, officials, and the media.”

The timeline also repeatedly claims that the current president encouraged peaceful protest (in fact, he stoked rage among rioters) and calls the insurrectionists “patriotic protestors.”

Insights for the LGBTQ+ community

Subscribe to our briefing for insights into how politics impacts the LGBTQ+ community and more.
Subscribe to our Newsletter today

Every part of the timeline and website is riddled with falsehoods and fascist propaganda.

“Words fail at the brazenness of the dishonesty in the White House’s new January 6 timeline,” wrote journalist Aaron Rupar on social media.

words fail at the brazenness of the dishonesty in the White House's new January 6 timeline: https://t.co/PzqdjERpsy pic.twitter.com/Px8JFpb1wn

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) January 6, 2026

Others who responded to Rupar called the timeline “reverse reality,” “insane,” and “f**king dangerous.” One even called it “enough to make you weep.”

“Goebbels would be blushing,” one person wrote, referring to the chief Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels.

Many also compared the language to that of George Orwell’s dystopian novel 1984, about a totalitarian superstate.

Subscribe to the LGBTQ Nation newsletter and be the first to know about the latest headlines shaping LGBTQ+ communities worldwide.


Comments (0)